Two industrial towers. They were still in construction. I don't know for what the purpose is of them. Anyone any ideas?
TECH-INFO: I would like to explain and demonstrate some personal thoughts and experiences about HDRi or High Dynamic Range Imaging. Feel free to disagree completely ;-)
For the picture above I took 5 images to capture the full dynamic range of light. A range of probably 10 to 12 stops. Almost all cameras cannot capture that without blocking shadows or blowing out highlights.
I used Photomatrix to combine all of them into one HDR 32 bit image. Such an image contains a huge range of tones, which is fantastic for someone who likes editing a lot. Here I only used tone compression to map the HDR image to a 8 bit JPG. No enhancement of details which is normally my primary goal of using Photomatrix.
This is how an image could and probably would look like if digital camera sensors would be able to capture a (much) higher dynamic range. Because of the necessary tone compression to 8 bit, most details and tone graduations in the clouds and the surface of the towers are lost. Also most LCD screens can only show 8 or 10 bits (for each RGB channel).
After tone compression, I only increased contrast in this image so it becomes comparable with the next two posts. Tomorrow I'll post the same but using the details enhancer instead of tone compression. And continue my discussion of HDRi.
Two Towers - HDRi Thoughts (1 of 3)
Two industrial towers. They were still in construction. I don't know for what the purpose is of them. Anyone any ideas?
TECH-INFO: I would like to explain and demonstrate some personal thoughts and experiences about HDRi or High Dynamic Range Imaging. Feel free to disagree completely ;-)
For the picture above I took 5 images to capture the full dynamic range of light. A range of probably 10 to 12 stops. Almost all cameras cannot capture that without blocking shadows or blowing out highlights.
I used Photomatrix to combine all of them into one HDR 32 bit image. Such an image contains a huge range of tones, which is fantastic for someone who likes editing a lot. Here I only used tone compression to map the HDR image to a 8 bit JPG. No enhancement of details which is normally my primary goal of using Photomatrix.
This is how an image could and probably would look like if digital camera sensors would be able to capture a (much) higher dynamic range. Because of the necessary tone compression to 8 bit, most details and tone graduations in the clouds and the surface of the towers are lost. Also most LCD screens can only show 8 or 10 bits (for each RGB channel).
After tone compression, I only increased contrast in this image so it becomes comparable with the next two posts. Tomorrow I'll post the same but using the details enhancer instead of tone compression. And continue my discussion of HDRi.
great capture, i'd rotate the picture a bit though to bring the tower ends on a horizontal line. One wouldn't realize this is done with photomatix at the first glance because it misses the artificial look of most HDR images.
Looking forward to the next in that series
LightningPaul: I'll highly appreciate your comments. Indeed, some rotation is welcome here. I didn't notice it until you brought it up. Thanks.
About the "HDR look": I did tone compression (compresses 32 into 8 bits) here. Mostly detail enhancement is done which tone maps the 32 bit image. I try to make my tone mapping to look pretty natural and still punchy enough to get a certain wow effect. See tomorrow
i'm a very big fan of hdri and will love to discuss at length with you anytime!
one thing i wonder is why makers of expensive cameras don't just introduce an on-camera hdri feature
hdri seems to be the future of photography anyways.
tomorrow i'll discuss the hdri purists
LightningPaul: Thanks for your comment DrAW. Great to hear you love HDRi, I didn't know about that. I think it won't be easy to implement camera on board HDRi processing. Especially there are so many controls to tweak the whole stuff. We'll see
Wow! Superb composition and clever shot. I think HDR is the future of photography.
LightningPaul: Many people think that too. For now still lots of controls and variables which must be tweaked before getting good HDR images. As long it won't be fully automatic I don't think it will become mainstream. However it has already taken a very important part in the photography and film world. Thanks for your comment.